?

Log in

No account? Create an account

moof's prattling

babblebabble


February 7th, 2011

(no subject) @ 01:20 am

Share  |  |

Comments

 
[User Picture Icon]
From:icis_machine
Date:February 9th, 2011 02:49 am (UTC)
(Link)
I'm actually going to not call this analogue. I call this bad library modelling.
[User Picture Icon]
From:moof
Date:February 9th, 2011 04:33 am (UTC)
(Link)
The thing that intrigued me the most (other than the failure mode) was that the problem modification was inserted after the first spin, and that the fix involves disabling the transistor. I'd like to know why, if the circuitry isn't actually needed, why they were bothering to monkey around with the voltage level at the B stepping.
I call it 'analogue' mostly because of the failure mode itself; I'd agree with you that the cause is probably the library modeling.

moof's prattling

babblebabble